Is the cohort recruitable, or just scientifically attractive?
Review biomarker burden, prior therapy, diagnosis path, screen-failure pressure, and competing studies.
Sponsor-side FIH strategy review
Before a site list, startup timeline, and operating budget harden, OncoLattice helps oncology sponsors test the plan that the CRO is being asked to execute.
The work
The output is not a generic platform demo. It is sponsor-side judgment: what to diligence first, what to challenge, and what not to lock too early.
Review biomarker burden, prior therapy, diagnosis path, screen-failure pressure, and competing studies.
Separate useful prestige from activation behavior, early-phase capability, mechanism experience, and patient access.
Flag recent trial load, similar-mechanism overlap, team capacity signals, and alternate investigator options.
Turn timeline, screen-failure, testing, startup, and enrollment assumptions into CRO-facing questions.
Services
If the decision is narrow, keep the work narrow. If the sponsor is already in CRO discussions, move into a deeper FIH Scout Plus review.
Apex AI relationship
OncoLattice Bio / AAI Inc. handles commercial engagements. Apex AI is part of the broader research and technology context. That separation is deliberate: client work proceeds under appropriate licensing, governance, and written authorization.
Built with research foundations from the Apex AI ecosystem.
Contracts, client work, and delivery run through OncoLattice Bio / AAI Inc.
Apex AI references do not imply direct nonprofit service or automatic expert participation.
We help sponsors pressure-test the execution path before site lists, competitor assumptions, and global development commitments harden.